Asus M4A785T-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4A785T-M  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20100415
Uptime15.7 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 02:33
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 94.6
49% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 183
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1125 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.9% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 73.9
56% 69 fps
MRender 59.1
Gravity 65.1
Splatting 38.7
43% 54.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI S270 240GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 39 75 56 60 66 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26% Poor
Read 148
Write 95.1
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 74.6
22% 98.5 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 11.9
49% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 12
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 26%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.3% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 5 75 7.2" 1280 720 SAM07E8 SAMSUNG
Typical M4A785T-M Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A785T-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback