Asrock B650M PG Lightning

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
25 days ago, 25 days ago.
SystemAsrock B650M PG Lightning  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B650M PG Lightning
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230728
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 02:29
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$189
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 79
1-Core 193
2-Core 382
113% 218 Pts
4-Core 712
8-Core 1,000
108% 856 Pts
64-Core 1,359
84% 1,359 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 106%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
PNY(196E 1404) ≥ 4GB; PNY 4060 OC
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 118
Parallax 162
140% 151 fps
MRender 208
Gravity 135
Splatting 109
118% 150 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 126%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
658GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3625 897 504 582 409 427 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,210
Write 3,816
Mixed 2,656
SusWrite 1074
552% 2,439 MB/s
4K Read 64.6
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 96.5
340% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,470
DQ Write 1,147
DQ Mixed 1,441
1,042% 1,353 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 317%
Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G48C40U5.M4A1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 49
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 44.7
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 45.4
SC Write 53.5
SC Mixed 48.8
141% 49.2 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 127%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 58 75 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B44 MP59HT
Typical B650M PG Lightning Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Asrock B650M PG Lightning

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback