MSI PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics213% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D78
MotherboardMSI PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78)  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 01:25
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$219
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 203
2-Core 368
116% 218 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,243
113% 948 Pts
64-Core 1882
116% 1882 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 103%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-GRE
XFX(1EAE 790A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
213% Outstanding
Lighting 278
Reflection 347
Parallax 554
227% 393 fps
MRender 325
Gravity 273
Splatting 368
268% 322 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 213%
Great: 228%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,449
Write 2,305
Mixed 1,686
478% 2,147 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 68.2
225% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,869
DQ Write 1,469
DQ Mixed 1637
1,234% 1,658 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
97GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 510
Write 484
Mixed 458
108% 484 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 50.6
170% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
55GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 513
Write 491
Mixed 466
109% 490 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 99.2
4K Mixed 53.8
182% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 371
280% 375 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
155GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 503
Write 299
Mixed 341
84% 381 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 50.8
175% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 229
211% 324 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
931GB free
Firmware: M3CR046
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 389
Write 461
Mixed 384
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 50.9
165% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 158
174% 293 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
10GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 146
Write 14.7
Mixed 25.6
54% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.2
103% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
100GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.1
Write 29.7
Mixed 23.5
35% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 4.2
280% 4.47 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3238F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
156% Outstanding
MC Read 48.9
MC Write 62.6
MC Mixed 55.8
159% 55.8 GB/s
SC Read 45.4
SC Write 67.3
SC Mixed 49.1
154% 53.9 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 156%
Great: 207%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 180 27" 1280 720 AOC2715 27G15
Typical PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78) Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 260%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $1,144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback