Gigabyte GA-B760M GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 191%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive351% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760M GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory52.4 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 01:22
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700F-$367
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 218
2-Core 438
126% 246 Pts
4-Core 828
8-Core 1,552
142% 1,190 Pts
64-Core 3,548
220% 3,548 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 118%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Asus(1043 8921) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 156
Parallax 176
146% 170 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 138
Splatting 99.3
115% 147 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 128%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02106
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2146 2178 2366 2477 2526 2536 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
351% Outstanding
Read 2,004
Write 2,598
Mixed 1,577
SusWrite 2,371
483% 2,138 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 230
4K Mixed 49
256% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,143
DQ Write 1,157
DQ Mixed 744
671% 1,015 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 351%
Great: 394%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C36-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
192% Outstanding
MC Read 78.1
MC Write 76.5
MC Mixed 73.7
217% 76.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 49.3
SC Mixed 33.5
99% 34.6 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 192%
Great: 275%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 11 180 27" 2560 1369 AUS27EF VG27AQ3A
Typical GA-B760M GAMING X Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 282%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 306%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760M GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,094
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback