Asus X555UB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus X555UB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555UB
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 00:39
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 131
57% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 206
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 940M
Asus(1043 246A) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4633
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
9.35% Terrible
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 11
10% 12.7 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 9.1
8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.35%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 341 327 307 301 292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 398
Mixed 392
SusWrite 322
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 43
140% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 348
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 97%
Great: 130%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
508GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 91 92 92 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 89.2
Write 87.8
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 91
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HDZ-1G6E1 Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.4% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 11.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD04E2
Typical X555UB Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555UB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback