Asrock B650M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive366% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock B650M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B650M-HDV/M.2
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231117
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '24 at 00:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$189
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 74.9
1-Core 155
2-Core 308
95% 179 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 899
89% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,078
67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 89%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
Sapphire(1DA2 E445) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 136
Parallax 283
115% 187 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 153
Splatting 208
165% 201 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S880 2TB
761GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11273
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3296 3165 2230 1802 1556 948 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
366% Outstanding
Read 3,317
Write 3,556
Mixed 2,830
SusWrite 2166
668% 2,967 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 56.5
184% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,267
DQ Write 721
DQ Mixed 1,105
793% 1,031 MB/s
Poor: 245%
This bench: 366%
Great: 611%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6400C36 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
156% Outstanding
MC Read 56.4
MC Write 55.9
MC Mixed 58.4
163% 56.9 GB/s
SC Read 50.3
SC Write 55.3
SC Mixed 49.7
148% 51.8 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 133%
This bench: 156%
Great: 207%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 0P 2R 6G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 47% 30 206 57 170 27" 1280 720 HKC27AA 27E3Q
Typical B650M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO

System: Asrock B650M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,065
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback