MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B85
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85)  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 17:11
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 72.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 279
88% 164 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 975
91% 756 Pts
64-Core 1,422
88% 1,422 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 187
Parallax 201
163% 196 fps
MRender 290
Gravity 165
Splatting 124
149% 193 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 147%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1263 988 969 954 933 944 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,580
Write 2,372
Mixed 1,745
SusWrite 1,008
431% 1,927 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 78.8
260% 88.9 MB/s
DQ Read 823
DQ Write 638
DQ Mixed 763
562% 741 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 278%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
706GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 207 207 206 207 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 379
Write 365
Mixed 356
SusWrite 206
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 49.1
160% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 244
184% 247 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 89%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$138
308GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 330 329 328 329 329 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 385
Write 335
Mixed 349
SusWrite 328
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 65.9
209% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 569
370% 432 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 117%
Great: 372%
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB
38GB free, PID ce15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 13 20 12 17 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 26.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 28.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 0P 5R 10G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 19 212 57 144 24" 1280 720 ACI24A4 VG248
Typical B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85) Builds (Compare 4,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85) - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $581
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback