Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151019
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 14:21
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 47.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 229
69% 132 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 651
65% 527 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.9% Average
Lighting 57
Reflection 66
Parallax 60.4
46% 61.1 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 52.3
48% 59.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 496 195 184 178 177 175 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 820
Write 775
Mixed 396
SusWrite 234
124% 556 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 12.7
47% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 327
201% 221 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 236%
Sandisk S064G 63GB
1GB free
Firmware: 3.1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 264
Write 34
Mixed 42.9
24% 114 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 8.2
29% 7.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 47%
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS1754D117-820 240GB
171GB free
Firmware: CS111101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 263 270 265 264 274 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 308
Write 275
Mixed 229
SusWrite 267
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 11.1
40% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 154
120% 165 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 87%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
156GB free
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 244 249 210 206 224 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 259
Write 263
Mixed 240
SusWrite 231
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 14.7
51% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 176
140% 195 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66% Good
MC Read 21
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 32.4
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 24" 1280 720 ACI24A5 VG248
Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,663 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 - $191

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $781
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback