CMS 7200-5868A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCMS 7200-5868A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B460M-A
Memory17.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 14:18
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105F
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 246
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 695
72% 577 Pts
64-Core 697
43% 697 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 870A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 151
Parallax 166
124% 157 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 135
Splatting 114
114% 144 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,505
Write 1,442
Mixed 1,164
305% 1,370 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 65.7
229% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 902
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 720
535% 717 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 237%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$122
36GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,095
Write 1,859
Mixed 1,291
319% 1,415 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 74
263% 99.4 MB/s
DQ Read 984
DQ Write 677
DQ Mixed 862
635% 841 MB/s
Poor: 129% Great: 307%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
35GB free
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 10 11 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.M8FB CT8G4DFRA32A.C8FP 24GB
2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
47.2% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 13.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 27" 2560 1369 ACR052F XB271HU A
Typical 7200-5868A Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: CMS 7200-5868A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback