Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 14:17
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 76
1-Core 156
2-Core 312
96% 181 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 1100
103% 855 Pts
64-Core 1,445
89% 1,445 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 191
Parallax 182
143% 183 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 179
Splatting 124
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 146
Write 106
Mixed 88
25% 113 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 10.8
49% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 14.9
11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
11GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 499
Write 489
Mixed 404
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 53
173% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 373
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
278GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2028 756 598 599 597 599 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2,485
Write 2,143
Mixed 1,660
SusWrite 863
399% 1,788 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 66
215% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,277
DQ Write 1,052
DQ Mixed 1,150
865% 1,160 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 271%
Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 185 190 187 191 189 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 108
Write 65
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 186
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 114%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 206 201 204 200 201 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C18-8GTZN Skill Intl F4-3600C16-8GTZNC Skill Intl F4-3600C18-8GTZN Skill Intl F4-3600C16-8GTZNC 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 25.8
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 27.8
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 0P 5R 8G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
57% 25% 67 217 59 144 24.5" 1920 1009 HPN3425 OMEN by HP 25
History: Score 57: 0P 5R 10G 2B | Score 55: 0P 5R 8G 6B
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback