HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics75% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory38.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180209
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 13:19
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 171
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 645
57% 483 Pts
64-Core 2,486
154% 2,486 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75% Very good
Lighting 94.7
Reflection 95.9
Parallax 86.1
77% 92.2 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 89.4
Splatting 77.3
71% 87.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
725GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKZ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 397 397 401 398 398 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 150
Write 64.8
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 394
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 8.8
34% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 13.7
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 12.9
10% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351R7EFR4C-RD HMT351R7CFR4C-PB HMT351R7EFR4C-RD HMT351R7EFR4C-RD HMT351R7CFR4C-PB HMT351R7EFR4C-RD ... 48GB
1866, 1600, 1866, 1866, 1600, 1866, 1866, 1600, 1866, 1866, 1600, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.1% Good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 22.9
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.9
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5ABA LG FULL HD
Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback