Dell Latitude E7450

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E7450  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 06HN6G
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150513
Uptime15.7 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 08:12
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 156
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 229
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 235
14% 235 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Dell(1028 062E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1.99% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.9
2% 1.77 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.99%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 mSATA 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT4AD0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 404
Write 249
Mixed 172
60% 275 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 20.8
80% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 73.3
114% 218 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 83%
ASolid USB 32GB
29GB free, PID 205a
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 60.9
Write 52.7
Mixed 73.4
81% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
94% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 4.4
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 38 60 14" 1280 720 SDC4C48
Typical Latitude E7450 Builds (Compare 2,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7450

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback