Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive26.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160504
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 03:01
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9370-$183
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.75 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
62.9% Good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 149
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 471
46% 374 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1565 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 77.7
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 108
63% 85 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 89.7
Splatting 53.6
56% 70.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 147 28 109 45 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.6% Poor
Read 165
Write 95
Mixed 84
SusWrite 93.7
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 10.5
45% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 10.9
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 14.4
11% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 100%
K2 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: V1111A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 381 391 391 397 399 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.3% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 407
Mixed 407
SusWrite 388
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 31
130% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 38.9
70% 136 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 91%
K2 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: V1111A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3,001
Write 1
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 1.2
156% 751 MB/s
4K Read 326
4K Mixed 0
741% 163 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 91%
Seagate ST4000NM0035-1V4107 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: TN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 187 185 187 188 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 159
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 187
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.2
272% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 109%
Great: 115%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 170 168 168 168 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 156
Mixed 90
SusWrite 168
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,684 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback