Lenovo INVALID

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo INVALID  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210818
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 02:52
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 43.9
1-Core 73
2-Core 134
46% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 553
57% 461 Pts
64-Core 622
38% 622 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F96) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44.24
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.22% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 16.8
7% 10.9 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 14.4
10% 11.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.22%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 367
Write 139
Mixed 120
45% 208 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 15.6
50% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 470
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 132
142% 246 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 190%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
20.7% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 6.5
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 8
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 225
18% 225 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 31 11 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN1406
Typical INVALID Builds (Compare 2,503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo INVALID

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback