Lenovo 83BF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83BF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '24 at 01:30
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 61.1
1-Core 171
2-Core 339
98% 190 Pts
4-Core 653
8-Core 686
89% 670 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3C45) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
8.95% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 11.3
8% 12.1 fps
MRender 14.5
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 12.1
11% 13.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.95%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ4X112N 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51040C31
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,348
Write 1726
Mixed 1,349
331% 1,474 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 31
150% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 695
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 517
374% 496 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 319%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
129% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 59.4
MC Mixed 48.5
145% 50.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 23.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 129%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 25 60 14" 1280 720 LEN9125
Typical 83BF Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 83BF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback