Lenovo 83DV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83DV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 18:13
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13650HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 65.9
1-Core 179
2-Core 352
102% 199 Pts
4-Core 733
8-Core 1270
121% 1,001 Pts
64-Core 1,923
119% 1,923 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3D06) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 5.2
4% 6 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 4
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ4X112N 512GB
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51030C31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2935 2861 2816 1428 848 366 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 1,824
Write 2,890
Mixed 1,951
SusWrite 1,876
484% 2,135 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 42.6
261% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,418
DQ Write 1,077
DQ Mixed 1,227
923% 1,241 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 319%
Great: 319%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA092N Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 16GB
5600, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
117% Outstanding
MC Read 49.5
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 44
130% 45.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 21.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 44: 0P 5R 5G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 25% 57 308 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUO7EAD
Typical 83DV Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 83DV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback