Asus PRIME B550M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B550M-A  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 23:06
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$85
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 266
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 884
86% 705 Pts
64-Core 1,073
66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gainward(10B0 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.8% Poor
Lighting 37.6
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 39.2
31% 39.5 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 28
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM710 500GB
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9742
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,987
Write 2409
Mixed 2,152
628% 2,849 MB/s
4K Read 65.3
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 84.6
287% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,221
DQ Write 665
DQ Mixed 897
679% 928 MB/s
Poor: 235% Great: 437%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
342GB free
Firmware: CC44
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 90.6
Write 94.8
Mixed 59.3
61% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Lexar Co Limited LD4BU008G-3600WG 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 32.9
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 33.7
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 53 216 57 60 24.1" 1280 720 NEC674F EA241WM
Typical PRIME B550M-A Builds (Compare 2,475 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B550M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $575
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback