HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
24 days ago, 24 days ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8307
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 21:40
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 76.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 271
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 767
74% 610 Pts
64-Core 775
48% 775 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Asus(1043 894A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 210
Reflection 191
Parallax 207
171% 203 fps
MRender 296
Gravity 169
Splatting 127
153% 197 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 152%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$189
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1586 1391 1385 1154 781 707 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1856
Write 2,023
Mixed 1,667
SusWrite 1,168
378% 1,678 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 44.6
173% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 618
DQ Mixed 776
576% 769 MB/s
Poor: 191%
This bench: 232%
Great: 337%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 202 202 201 202 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 139
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 202
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 115%
Great: 114%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
692GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 113 113 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69% Good
Read 126
Write 74.5
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 114
61% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 859B CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 25.1
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 22
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 31.5" 1280 720 HPN3727 HP X32
Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback