Asus PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics245% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 months ago, 24 days ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231211
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 21:39
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$210
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 40.3
1-Core 161
2-Core 299
84% 167 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 972
93% 768 Pts
64-Core 1,551
96% 1,551 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Nvidia(10DE 167A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
245% Outstanding
Lighting 359
Reflection 362
Parallax 385
292% 369 fps
MRender 475
Gravity 290
Splatting 231
260% 332 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 245%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1459 985 281 317 317 322 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,440
Write 1,662
Mixed 1,537
SusWrite 614
296% 1,313 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 70.8
247% 93.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,504
DQ Write 1,220
DQ Mixed 1,314
996% 1,346 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 232%
Great: 365%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
246GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 369 372 389 416 409 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 381
Mixed 395
SusWrite 386
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 33.7
122% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 280
227% 323 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 125%
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
474GB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3013 3022 3027 2990 3092 3079 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
384% Outstanding
Read 1,580
Write 2536
Mixed 1,956
SusWrite 3,037
518% 2,277 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 65.7
233% 90.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,737
DQ Write 1,156
DQ Mixed 1,499
1,104% 1,464 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 384%
Great: 517%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
268GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 173 175 186 180 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 172
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 180
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
408GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 149 147 150 147 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 155
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 148
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 19.5
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 75 34" 1280 720 GBT3403 G34WQC A
Typical PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 9,827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 177%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 195%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback