Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
27 days ago, 27 days ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-E R2.0/BR  (all builds)
Memory19.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 21:21
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 680
73% 579 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Nvidia(10DE 145C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44% Average
Lighting 54.1
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 49.6
44% 53.7 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 49
Splatting 50.2
44% 54.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nt-256 2280 256GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN14941
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 74 101 359 217 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 400
Write 429
Mixed 417
SusWrite 157
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 40.7
147% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 246
183% 237 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 102%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
36GB free
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 269 102 107 105 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.7% Above average
Read 203
Write 106
Mixed 116
SusWrite 186
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 30.3
102% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 88.4
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 197
128% 147 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
131GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 71.9
Write 49.7
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 74.3
45% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX426C15FB/16 M378A1K43BB2G3A141 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.7% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 21.9
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 167 2 60 34.1" 2560 1057 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical PRIME H310M-E R2.0/BR Builds (Compare 949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback