Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 21:15
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 77.6
1-Core 170
2-Core 337
102% 195 Pts
4-Core 644
8-Core 955
100% 800 Pts
64-Core 1,109
69% 1,109 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 227
Parallax 169
133% 186 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 129
Splatting 104
113% 143 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 121%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 853
Write 1,155
Mixed 869
215% 959 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 81.3
284% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 785
DQ Write 850
DQ Mixed 637
529% 757 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 168%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
27GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 24.6
Mixed 40
58% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.4
170% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.3% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 28.4
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 27.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 240 24.5" 1280 720 BNQ7F81 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1,173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $609
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback