Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory52.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime14 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 19:25
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900KF
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 70.5
1-Core 155
2-Core 305
93% 177 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1,082
101% 840 Pts
64-Core 1555
96% 1555 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
MSI(1462 C75C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 116
Parallax 134
106% 127 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 127
Splatting 107
110% 139 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
710GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 431 450 458 460 414 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 457
Mixed 401
SusWrite 437
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 42.3
142% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 286
231% 328 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 106%
Great: 125%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
446GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 275 253 264 253 260 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 431
Write 366
Mixed 337
SusWrite 276
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 36.5
126% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 210
180% 263 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 102%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
879GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2790 3108 2809 1645 1654 1657 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
395% Outstanding
Read 2597
Write 2,970
Mixed 2,763
SusWrite 2,277
599% 2,652 MB/s
4K Read 70.2
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 98
321% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,331
DQ Write 1,002
DQ Mixed 1,147
863% 1,160 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 395%
Great: 526%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 177 177 178 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 178
Mixed 107
SusWrite 177
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CP32G4DFRA32A.C16FF 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78.7% Very good
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 21.2
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 27
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G8
Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $634
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback