Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180529
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 18:51
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 94.8
2-Core 178
64% 114 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 177
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gig@tech 128GB SSD 128GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 56 35 66 74 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.3% Above average
Read 498
Write 433
Mixed 210
SusWrite 73.2
67% 304 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 0.6
82% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 65.9
DQ Mixed 21.6
34% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
1TB free
Firmware: A750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 94 97 99 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 106
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 97.3
59% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial UDIMM DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$21
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 11.7
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 10.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 0P 5R 4G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 41% 29 195 57 60 0" 1920 1017
Typical H110M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback