MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7917
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 18:23
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 208
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 464
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus Radeon RX Vega
PowerColor(148C 2387) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.1% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 111
Parallax 177
93% 134 fps
MRender 90.3
Gravity 132
Splatting 75.3
79% 99.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3PSSD8 500GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 663 695 659 703 710 703 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 623
Write 678
Mixed 647
SusWrite 689
149% 659 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 62.2
195% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 738
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 807
584% 754 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 161%
Great: 315%
3 1TB SSD 1TB
751GB free
Firmware: S1011A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 380 365 382 386 385 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 481
Write 431
Mixed 334
SusWrite 379
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 20.3
104% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 27
79% 162 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 100%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 150 151 150 152 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 154
Mixed 86.6
SusWrite 151
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 91%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
78.4% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 23.3
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 20.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 48.4
83% 48.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 0P 5R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 13% 119 209 57 75 27" 1920 1009 AUS27AE ASUS VP278
Typical Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917) Builds (Compare 6,858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback