Lenovo 20WE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 20WE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime32.5 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 18:09
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 134
2-Core 214
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 374
43% 333 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3F17) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1960
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.8
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 0.2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SKHynix_HFM512GD3HX015N 512GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C21 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 911 807 719 703 661 666 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 2,364
Write 2,260
Mixed 1,687
SusWrite 744
394% 1,764 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 89.5
299% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 578
DQ Write 451
DQ Mixed 503
380% 511 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 256%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 8.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 9.3
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 1R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 8% 73 43 32 60 14" 1280 720 LEN889A
Typical 20WE Builds (Compare 491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20WE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback