Hp-pavilion AU992AA-ABL e9262f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion AU992AA-ABL e9262f  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Indio
Memory6.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 16:21
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 132
58% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 234
34% 249 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.5% Above average
Lighting 62.9
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 61.2
51% 63.2 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 65
Splatting 59.7
52% 64 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
499GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST6OA39D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.1 3.8 5.3 4.5 4.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. CE80CE80 M378B5673EH1-CH9 9B852C80 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 14.3
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10.9
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 SHP0080 LC-32D59U
Typical AU992AA-ABL e9262f Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion AU992AA-ABL e9262f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $72
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback