Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200827
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 15:49
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 74.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 742
73% 599 Pts
64-Core 903
56% 903 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1230 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.6% Average
Lighting 54.1
Reflection 56.9
Parallax 73.9
44% 61.6 fps
MRender 57.1
Gravity 60.5
Splatting 42.5
43% 53.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 120GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 495
Write 483
Mixed 423
104% 467 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 53.8
179% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 354
266% 354 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
112GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 156 156 156 156 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 476
Mixed 418
SusWrite 190
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 53.8
180% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 354
268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 30.9
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 27.1
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 199 55 60 23" 1280 720 JCHE005 UDEA monitor
Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $444
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback