MSI MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive376% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D54
MotherboardMSI MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54)  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 15:36
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 158
2-Core 313
103% 188 Pts
4-Core 627
8-Core 1,225
110% 926 Pts
64-Core 2,247
139% 2,247 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
EVGA(3842 3658) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 131
Parallax 126
114% 132 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 102
Splatting 97.9
91% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO LPX 2TB
897GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3082 3227 3287 2459 2392 2345 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
376% Outstanding
Read 2,529
Write 3,881
Mixed 2,924
SusWrite 2,799
688% 3,033 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 95.1
4K Mixed 70.5
217% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 1,038
DQ Write 586
DQ Mixed 880
636% 835 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 376%
Great: 602%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 212 209 204 211 211 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 189
Write 208
Mixed 205
SusWrite 209
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 1.2
72% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 4.3
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 1.6
3% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 45%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 184 182 189 184 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 232
Write 242
Mixed 220
SusWrite 184
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 1.5
70% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 4.1
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 2.3
4% 7.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 45%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
9TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 228 230 219 220 220 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 213
Write 216
Mixed 207
SusWrite 224
49% 215 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 1.4
71% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 4.8
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 0.5
2% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 45%
ST20000NM007D-3DJ103 20TB
6TB free
Firmware: SN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 245 245 246 251 243 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 246
Write 244
Mixed 196
SusWrite 245
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 1
75% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 4.2
DQ Write 14.1
DQ Mixed 0.6
3% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 60.2
MC Write 46.2
MC Mixed 48.1
147% 51.5 GB/s
SC Read 32.2
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 43.1
98% 34.1 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 137%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 44: 0P 5R 6G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 34% 29 158 56 144 23.5" 1920 1057 AOC2401 24G1WG3-
History: Score 40: 0P 5R 5G 0B | Score 44: 0P 5R 6G 1B
Typical MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54) Builds (Compare 2,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $1,309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback