MSI MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive484% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D54
MotherboardMSI MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54)  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '24 at 09:34
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 157
2-Core 313
103% 188 Pts
4-Core 633
8-Core 1,260
112% 947 Pts
64-Core 2,248
139% 2,248 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
EVGA(3842 3658) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 133
Parallax 129
118% 136 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 104
Splatting 99.8
93% 116 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 108%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO LPX 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3291 3887 4287 4299 4261 3347 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
484% Outstanding
Read 2769
Write 4,364
Mixed 3,108
SusWrite 3,895
803% 3,534 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 97.2
306% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,047
DQ Write 701
DQ Mixed 892
661% 880 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 484%
Great: 602%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 226 233 229 228 227 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
45% Average
Read 204
Write 200
Mixed 200
SusWrite 228
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 1.6
85% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 3.8
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 1.6
3% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 191 189 185 183 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 229
Write 241
Mixed 194
SusWrite 187
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 1.4
81% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 4.5
DQ Write 12.9
DQ Mixed 1.5
3% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 45%
ST16000NM001G-2KK103 16TB
9TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 218 229 237 233 220 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 185
Write 178
Mixed 122
SusWrite 225
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 1.2
14% 4.8 MB/s
DQ Read 5.2
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 1.8
4% 7.63 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 45%
ST20000NM007D-3DJ103 20TB
6TB free
Firmware: SN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 247 250 246 249 246 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 248
Write 249
Mixed 232
SusWrite 248
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 21.7
4K Mixed 0.3
86% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 4
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 0.2
3% 5.87 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 60
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 47.5
147% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 32.9
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 43.9
99% 34.6 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 137%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 49: 0P 5R 8G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
44% 35% 34 557 460 144 23.5" 1920 1080 AOC2401 24G1WG3-
History: Score 44: 0P 5R 6G 1B | Score 49: 0P 5R 8G 0B
Typical MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54) Builds (Compare 2,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 200%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570S TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI (MS-7D54)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $1,309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback