Toshiba SATELLITE L755

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L755  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120619
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 10:05
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 158
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 329
37% 291 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M
Toshiba(1179 FC50) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 0.5
2% 2.43 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3
Splatting 2.2
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$66
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 345 344 354 346 346 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 400
Mixed 392
SusWrite 347
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 35.8
118% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 342
259% 349 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5428-E02.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.9% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 6% 47 86 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD02DC
Typical SATELLITE L755 Builds (Compare 509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback