Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181019
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 09:42
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 141
2-Core 269
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 849
83% 682 Pts
64-Core 1,334
83% 1,334 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
PNY(196E 1210) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 186
Parallax 176
137% 176 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 172
Splatting 121
114% 141 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1013 1575 1755 1748 1738 1731 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,263
Write 2,120
Mixed 2,006
SusWrite 1,593
449% 1,996 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 70.8
231% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 948
DQ Write 724
DQ Mixed 816
616% 829 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 297%
Great: 515%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
119GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 454 458 462 453 451 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 454
Mixed 442
SusWrite 455
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 45.7
155% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
105GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 100 100 101 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 81.9
Write 88.2
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 100
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
75GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 155 157 157 159 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 140
Write 111
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 156
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
124GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 109 110 111 112 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 106
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 63%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
274GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 94 95 97 97 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 119
Write 108
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 95.8
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 25.9
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 21.1
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 56.9
70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27.9" 1280 720 ACI28A3 ASUS PB287Q
Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $1,252
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback