Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 290%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 290%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics254% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive388% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 04:38
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 99.4
1-Core 196
2-Core 355
118% 217 Pts
4-Core 736
8-Core 1,278
122% 1,007 Pts
64-Core 1762
109% 1762 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-TS (Ti-Super)-$780
Gigabyte(1458 413F) ≥ 4GB; aero
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
254% Outstanding
Lighting 377
Reflection 373
Parallax 393
307% 381 fps
MRender 472
Gravity 312
Splatting 222
261% 335 fps
Poor: 233%
This bench: 254%
Great: 265%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2528 2516 2672 2819 2752 1611 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
388% Outstanding
Read 2,460
Write 2828
Mixed 2,615
SusWrite 2483
587% 2,596 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 67.6
232% 79.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,672
DQ Write 1,315
DQ Mixed 1,501
1,121% 1,496 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 388%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3038F16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
187% Outstanding
MC Read 59.3
MC Write 70.8
MC Mixed 69.7
190% 66.6 GB/s
SC Read 57.2
SC Write 74.2
SC Mixed 63.9
186% 65.1 GB/s
Latency 51.9
77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 146%
This bench: 187%
Great: 238%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 62 49 165 31.5" 1707 889 GSM5BD3 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback