User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
29 days ago, 29 days ago.
SystemMACHINIST
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-MR9A PRO MAX
Memory42.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230429
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 03:58
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 92.8
2-Core 178
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 680
60% 509 Pts
64-Core 1592
98% 1592 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 119
Parallax 124
110% 126 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 103
Splatting 88.5
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 512GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1013A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 787 300 275 271 274 608 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,744
Write 1,614
Mixed 1,183
SusWrite 419
277% 1,240 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 25.6
129% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 550
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 508
376% 497 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 155%
Great: 187%
Kbg40znt256g TOSHIBA MEMORY 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 0105AELA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1179 753 414 415 406 397 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,264
Write 1,491
Mixed 1,229
SusWrite 594
258% 1,144 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 51.2
165% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 590
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 535
380% 489 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 159%
Great: 218%
S3SSDC1T0 1TB
211GB free
Firmware: W0714A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 429 429 421 420 420 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 482
Write 418
Mixed 394
SusWrite 425
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 22.6
106% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 47.4
99% 197 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
118% Outstanding
MC Read 57
MC Write 42.5
MC Mixed 41.6
134% 47 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 118%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 7.2" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback