Asus PRIME B560M-A AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B560M-A AC  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 01:16
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$180
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 79.9
1-Core 133
2-Core 265
87% 159 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 846
82% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,114
69% 1,114 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
AMD(1002 0E36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 131
Parallax 292
113% 187 fps
MRender 235
Gravity 145
Splatting 195
156% 192 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 351 326 349 351 330 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 464
Mixed 440
SusWrite 354
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 44.3
145% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 186
158% 236 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GB-$165
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
71.7% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 23
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 0P 3R 1G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 39% 36 208 57 240 27" 1280 720 AOCB314 Q27G3WG8
Typical PRIME B560M-A AC Builds (Compare 3,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B560M-A AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback