Lenovo 82KU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82KU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221209
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 12 '24 at 00:17
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 64.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 238
77% 143 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 624
65% 523 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F95) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.20.44.56
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
9.59% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 17.5
9% 12.9 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 12
Splatting 14.4
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.59%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ymtc YMSS1ED04B21MC 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LN015216
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,533
Write 597
Mixed 96.1
160% 742 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 48.1
154% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 692
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 116
222% 448 MB/s
Poor: 117% Great: 214%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 Micron MT40A512M16TB-062E:R 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 20.2
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 18.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 75 15.5" 1280 720 AUO369F
Typical 82KU Builds (Compare 1,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82KU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback