Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive353% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 19:39
Run Duration392 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 89.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 311
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 973
98% 794 Pts
64-Core 1101
68% 1101 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
Asus(1043 886E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 268
Parallax 298
145% 248 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 239
Splatting 182
202% 258 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 152%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
604GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2202 2017 1975 1936 1945 1937 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,486
Write 2,589
Mixed 1,878
SusWrite 2,002
504% 2,239 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 74
271% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,218
DQ Write 963
DQ Mixed 1,067
805% 1,083 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 353%
Great: 488%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
219GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 290 291 291 291 290 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 497
Mixed 419
SusWrite 311
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 64.6
220% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 125%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
634GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 495 495 495 495 495 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 520
Write 497
Mixed 453
SusWrite 494
111% 491 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 68.6
230% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 139%
Great: 133%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA250CM10002 250GB
163GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 286 286 280 282 284 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 406
Mixed 408
SusWrite 288
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 44.9
165% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 216
204% 316 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Seagate BarraCuda 510 SSD ZP1000CM30001 1TB
558GB free
Firmware: STPSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2409 2475 1165 1023 1033 1022 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 1,659
Write 2,391
Mixed 1774
SusWrite 1,521
416% 1,836 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 68.4
231% 84.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,504
DQ Write 965
DQ Mixed 635
635% 1,035 MB/s
Poor: 151%
This bench: 286%
Great: 296%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
1TB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2270 2289 2291 2301 2298 2278 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
408% Outstanding
Read 2,516
Write 2,304
Mixed 2,247
SusWrite 2,288
527% 2,339 MB/s
4K Read 82.4
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 114
369% 127 MB/s
DQ Read 1,276
DQ Write 1,055
DQ Mixed 1153
867% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 408%
Great: 592%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 39.7
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.8
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 39.2
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 102%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 180 34.1" 1280 720 AUS346A XG349C
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 9,597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI) - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $977
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback