Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 80% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	81.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Gaming K6 (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '18 at 14:57
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Memory 96.3 1-Core 153 2-Core 254 96% 168 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 954 88% 733 Pts	64-Core 1,310 81% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.5% Excellent	Lighting 101 Reflection 114 Parallax 98.3 82% 104 fps	MRender 95.7 Gravity 101 Splatting 98.4 81% 98.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$90 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8157 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 324 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 94 94 93 (AE) Unknown 100 100 121 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (B8) Unknown 98 98 2 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 73 48 223339020315 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 7 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 94 94 6 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 100945961800 (F7) Unknown 100 100 3157783495 (F8) Unknown 100 100 1157628495 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4414 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	85% Excellent	Read 484 Write 341 Mixed 338 86% 388 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 78.1 4K Mixed 23.6 112% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 212 DQ Mixed 15.4 77% 176 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 105%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3TB free Firmware: 9401 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 94%
Seagate ST2000DL001 2TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 986GB free Firmware: CC92 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 88 208882208 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 8097 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 62 190729956 (09) Power-on hours count 49 49 44927 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1999 (B7) Unknown 89 89 11 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 6401 (BC) Unknown 100 98 51540394081 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 48 505282590 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1697 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6613 (C2) HDA temperature 30 52 64424509470 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 119 99 208882208 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 94 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 94 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 37812892114688 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3038969229 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2464967833	73.6% Very good	Read 131 Write 126 Mixed 124 96% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.06 4K Mixed 0.14 64% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 71%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 764GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 212 162 4400 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1164 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4009 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 99 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 74 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5277 (C2) HDA temperature 124 108 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	68.7% Good	Read 122 Write 118 Mixed 105 86% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.27 100% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 376GB free Firmware: 9401 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 92 Write 60.8 Mixed 93 62% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 0.46 196% 2.52 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 94%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 268GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 191 177 7408 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2210 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 22072 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 182 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 120 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 182 182 55749 (C2) HDA temperature 121 104 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	82.3% Excellent	Read 148 Write 139 Mixed 119 101% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.23 83% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 87%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 240GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 192 180 7375 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1737 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10837 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 148 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 101 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 190 190 32942 (C2) HDA temperature 122 104 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	59.8% Above average	Read 121 Write 87.3 Mixed 97.9 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.27 82% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB-$40 28,855 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 36.3 MC Mixed 25.9 94% 32.9 GB/s	SC Read 22.2 SC Write 40 SC Mixed 29.4 87% 30.5 GB/s	Latency 52.9 76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 974 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 111%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Gaming K6

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	562x
Core i5-8600KIntel $139Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	153x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	126x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	108x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	62x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	34x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	31x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	37x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $757

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16