Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 140%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 19:05
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 168
2-Core 327
105% 195 Pts
4-Core 633
8-Core 874
95% 753 Pts
64-Core 1,098
68% 1,098 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4883 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 183
Parallax 222
177% 208 fps
MRender 272
Gravity 157
Splatting 117
141% 182 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 152%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 386 371 420 375 351 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 383
Write 426
Mixed 302
SusWrite 386
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 31.9
111% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 204
158% 216 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 101%
Patriot M.2 P300 512GB
49GB free
Firmware: APF1M3R0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,288
Write 2,164
Mixed 1,641
383% 1,698 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 66.4
221% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 1,424
DQ Write 963
DQ Mixed 1,253
919% 1,213 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 286%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
137GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 154 156 157 159 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 120
Write 81.4
Mixed 78.6
SusWrite 156
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 38.1
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 39.6
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 42: 0P 4R 4G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
42% 18% 101 168 2 60 7.2" 1920 1009 SAM08FE SAMSUNG
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback