MSI MPG X670E CARBON WIFI (MS-7D70)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 210%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics173% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive358% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D70
MotherboardMSI MPG X670E CARBON WIFI (MS-7D70)  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 16:43
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 98.8
1-Core 195
2-Core 383
120% 226 Pts
4-Core 758
8-Core 1,459
132% 1,108 Pts
64-Core 1,790
111% 1,790 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 120%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
XFX(1EAE 6701) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
173% Outstanding
Lighting 205
Reflection 238
Parallax 414
167% 286 fps
MRender 394
Gravity 162
Splatting 312
237% 290 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 173%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000T700SSD3 1TB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5601 5983 6005 5414 1896 5269 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
358% Outstanding
Read 1,036
Write 1,035
Mixed 917
SusWrite 5028
458% 2,004 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 8.8
29% 8.8 MB/s
DQ Read 8.5
DQ Write 8.9
DQ Mixed 8.3
6% 8.57 MB/s
Poor: 434%
This bench: 358%
Great: 723%
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
813GB free
Firmware: 620361WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3809 3889 2989 1079 1017 1070 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
456% Outstanding
Read 3,847
Write 4,202
Mixed 3,032
SusWrite 2,309
753% 3,347 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 70.6
241% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 2,150
DQ Write 1759
DQ Mixed 1,847
1,412% 1,919 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 456%
Great: 598%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
859GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 478 480 485 486 484 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 490
Mixed 462
SusWrite 482
110% 486 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 51.8
170% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 370
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Sandisk S-1T00 1TB
594GB free
Firmware: 411040RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 454 458 459 457 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 480
Mixed 396
SusWrite 459
103% 459 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 45.7
159% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 256
218% 321 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 113%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX5M2B6000Z30 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
199% Outstanding
MC Read 80.8
MC Write 65.4
MC Mixed 73.5
209% 73.2 GB/s
SC Read 54.2
SC Write 54.2
SC Mixed 63.7
164% 57.4 GB/s
Latency 42.2
95% 42.2 ns
Poor: 146%
This bench: 199%
Great: 289%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 27" 2560 1369 BNQ7F76 BenQ EX2780Q
Typical MPG X670E CARBON WIFI (MS-7D70) Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X670E CARBON WIFI (MS-7D70)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback