HP OMEN by HP Laptop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8467
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 16:43
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 212
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 549
57% 458 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
HP(103C 8467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.4% Average
Lighting 49.6
Reflection 61.1
Parallax 53.9
40% 54.9 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 52.4
Splatting 55.2
46% 56.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 245 227 225 223 219 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,567
Write 1,394
Mixed 1,021
SusWrite 239
235% 1,056 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 56.1
182% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 808
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 679
512% 690 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 165%
Great: 235%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
328GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 109 107 103 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 106
60% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
79.4% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 22.9
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 25.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 2% 45 213 56 75 27" 1280 720 SAM707F LF27T35
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop Builds (Compare 6,140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback