Microsoft Surface Laptop 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Laptop 4  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Laptop 4
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2256 x 1504 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231219
Uptime25.3 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 16:30
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1185G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 36.4
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 162
50% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 370
41% 322 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Microsoft(1414 0050) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 23.4
Parallax 20.7
9% 18.5 fps
MRender 17.2
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 17.3
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ9LQ512HALU-00000 512GB
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV72M0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 564 561 549 544 576 586 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 386
Write 600
Mixed 428
SusWrite 563
112% 494 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 26.1
85% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 624
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 300
244% 360 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 156%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNCPMMLXR-NEE 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 58
MC Mixed 38.3
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 12.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 218
18% 218 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 109%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 4% 57 114 56 60 13.5" 1280 720 SHP14B3 LQ135P1JX51
Typical Surface Laptop 4 Builds (Compare 1,930 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Microsoft Surface Laptop 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback