Gigabyte GA-Z790 UD AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive433% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z790 UD AC  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 16:11
Run Duration351 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$146
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 81.6
1-Core 177
2-Core 338
106% 199 Pts
4-Core 673
8-Core 1,019
105% 846 Pts
64-Core 1,228
76% 1,228 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
MSI(1462 3980) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 21.10.34
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 135
Parallax 286
108% 185 fps
MRender 229
Gravity 140
Splatting 167
144% 179 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 117%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3239 3010 3013 2523 1600 1681 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
433% Outstanding
Read 2,455
Write 2,980
Mixed 2,748
SusWrite 2511
605% 2,674 MB/s
4K Read 82.5
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 120
395% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 1,429
DQ Write 1,219
DQ Mixed 1,311
986% 1,320 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 433%
Great: 488%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
94GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 465 464 463 463 464 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 446
Mixed 434
SusWrite 466
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 49.4
175% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
Sabrent Rocket Q4 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: RKT40Q.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3216 3277 3272 3284 3287 1014 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
379% Outstanding
Read 1,469
Write 3,034
Mixed 1,556
SusWrite 2,892
510% 2,238 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 84.1
266% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,460
DQ Write 1,267
DQ Mixed 1,397
1,038% 1,375 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 379%
Great: 421%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
2TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 166 167 168 167 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 115
Write 83.6
Mixed 70.4
SusWrite 166
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 96%
Seagate ST16000NM000J-2TW103 16TB
3TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 163 161 163 163 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 123%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
392GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 96 97 97 97 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 138
Write 106
Mixed 80
SusWrite 96.1
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 96%
WD Green SN350 2TB
44GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 157 139 142 140 142 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6400J3239G164x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
194% Outstanding
MC Read 72.7
MC Write 84
MC Mixed 73.2
219% 76.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 47.3
SC Mixed 36
103% 36.2 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 132%
This bench: 194%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 75 27" 1280 720 SAM7315 LS27C36x
Typical GA-Z790 UD AC Builds (Compare 1,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z790 UD AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $1,255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback