Samsung 960QGK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 960QGK  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP960QGK-KS1UK
Memory2.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240323
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 15:32
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Memory 20.3
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 210
51% 107 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 460
39% 338 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
Sanyo(144D C892) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 26.1
Parallax 70.6
13% 37.6 fps
MRender 29.6
Gravity 50.4
Splatting 60.4
40% 46.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDSN740-SDDPNQD-1T00-1004 1TB
802GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73100004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2956 2283 2918 2598 1820 1838 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 1,758
Write 1,863
Mixed 1,503
SusWrite 2,402
426% 1,881 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 70.4
216% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 933
DQ Write 701
DQ Mixed 880
641% 838 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 321%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 55.5
MC Write 55.8
MC Mixed 70.9
174% 60.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 20.8
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 147%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 40 60 16" 1280 720 SDC4187
Typical 960QGK Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Samsung 960QGK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback