Samsung 750QFG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive526% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 750QFG  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT750QFG-RS9
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230427
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 17 '23 at 22:35
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1360P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 59.5
1-Core 191
2-Core 322
100% 191 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 810
88% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,051
65% 1,051 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C884) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 23.2
16% 23.2 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 26.2
Splatting 22
20% 24.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDSN740-SDDPNQD-1T00-1004 1TB
851GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73100004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3354 3344 3383 3593 3732 3704 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
526% Outstanding
Read 3,748
Write 3,520
Mixed 2,798
SusWrite 3,518
764% 3,396 MB/s
4K Read 72.4
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 94.4
330% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,498
DQ Write 1,187
DQ Mixed 1,346
1,006% 1,344 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 526%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AB-MGCL 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 49.4
MC Write 53.3
MC Mixed 51
146% 51.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 52.1
SC Mixed 20
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 131%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 60 15.5" 1920 1009 SDC4159
Typical 750QFG Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Samsung 750QFG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback