Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 244%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 280%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics246% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive334% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
27 days ago, 27 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 12:32
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 75.3
1-Core 182
2-Core 363
108% 207 Pts
4-Core 709
8-Core 1,329
122% 1,019 Pts
64-Core 2,330
144% 2,330 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$765
Zotac(19DA 5696) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
246% Outstanding
Lighting 359
Reflection 346
Parallax 370
293% 358 fps
MRender 494
Gravity 302
Splatting 217
262% 338 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 246%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M480 1TB
603GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2567 1451 1178 1089 1084 1063 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2158
Write 2,550
Mixed 2232
SusWrite 1,405
471% 2,086 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 102
327% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,493
DQ Write 1169
DQ Mixed 1,308
985% 1,323 MB/s
Poor: 179%
This bench: 334%
Great: 481%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
69GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 63 96 128 119 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 513
Write 456
Mixed 434
SusWrite 162
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 32.2
154% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 0.5
80% 190 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 89%
Great: 92%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
253GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2312 793 797 798 796 798 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 2,658
Write 2,475
Mixed 1,964
SusWrite 1049
456% 2,036 MB/s
4K Read 68.7
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 98.4
326% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,466
DQ Write 1,184
DQ Mixed 1,303
981% 1,318 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 331%
Great: 355%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
267GB free
Firmware: 04.01G01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 84 85 84 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 62.5
Write 65.4
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 84.3
50% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.7% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 40" 1280 720 SAM0C39 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-B550 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 2,712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback