Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512FJ
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 11:04
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 27.1
2-Core 47.4
17% 37.2 Pts
4-Core 79.3
8-Core 84.9
11% 82.1 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 24% Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1851) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2
Parallax 4.9
3% 3.63 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 6
Splatting 8.7
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Ghost PCIe 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103F0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 38 20 112 114 307 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 1797
Write 13.4
Mixed 112
SusWrite 110
107% 508 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 9.8
50% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 117
115% 184 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 103%
Great: 183%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
293GB free
Firmware: JU0C1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 92 96 95 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 125
Write 147
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 95.3
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
199% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.08% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.43 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 1.4
6% 2.07 GB/s
Latency 834
5% 834 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 9.08%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 26 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP0046
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512FJ_X512FJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback