Gigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE X AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 134%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics253% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE X AX  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 10:13
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K-$360
U3E1, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 231
2-Core 460
136% 262 Pts
4-Core 923
8-Core 1,815
162% 1369 Pts
64-Core 3,859
239% 3,859 Pts
Poor: 124%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-TS (Ti-Super)-$791
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
253% Outstanding
Lighting 374
Reflection 365
Parallax 383
305% 374 fps
MRender 480
Gravity 295
Splatting 231
262% 335 fps
Poor: 233%
This bench: 253%
Great: 265%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$155
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,793
Write 4,269
Mixed 2,855
675% 2,972 MB/s
4K Read 93.3
4K Write 326
4K Mixed 148
504% 189 MB/s
DQ Read 2,251
DQ Write 1,726
DQ Mixed 1,967
1,477% 1,981 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 587%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
22GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 21.6
Write 10.9
Mixed 14.9
19% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.6
172% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-7600J3646G162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 7600 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
236% Outstanding
MC Read 105
MC Write 87.9
MC Mixed 90.2
270% 94.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 54.3
SC Mixed 36.3
110% 38.4 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 146%
This bench: 236%
Great: 270%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 120 27" 1280 720 GBT2716 G27QC A
Typical GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE X AX Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 456%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 579%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $2,165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback