Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 06:47
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$219
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 75.9
1-Core 194
2-Core 424
117% 231 Pts
4-Core 685
8-Core 1,389
122% 1,037 Pts
64-Core 1,766
109% 1,766 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 102%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$361
Zotac(19DA 7717) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 198
Reflection 186
Parallax 201
162% 195 fps
MRender 275
Gravity 161
Splatting 121
144% 186 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 145%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP500GM30001 500GB
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STOSC014
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,762
Write 2,119
Mixed 1,696
417% 1,859 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 57.1
187% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,594
DQ Write 1,583
DQ Mixed 1,514
1,158% 1,564 MB/s
Poor: 122% Great: 355%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6400C32 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
141% Outstanding
MC Read 50.7
MC Write 50.8
MC Mixed 49.6
144% 50.4 GB/s
SC Read 46.7
SC Write 54.3
SC Mixed 49.1
143% 50 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 141%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 165 27" 1280 720 AUS2722 VG27A
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 271%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 275%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback