Asrock B560M-C

Performance Results

Gaming 103%
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 11 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock B560M-C  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210721
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateMay 11 '24 at 04:16
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$113
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 78.3
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 866
87% 709 Pts
64-Core 1,102
68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
PowerColor(148C 2310) ≥ 4GB; Power color fighter
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 121
Parallax 232
97% 157 fps
MRender 203
Gravity 132
Splatting 178
140% 171 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 109%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8H40104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1361 1524 1507 581 653 522 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,383
Write 1,551
Mixed 1,069
SusWrite 1,024
283% 1,257 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 26.1
159% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 791
DQ Mixed 515
452% 670 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 197%
Great: 244%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 194 194 193 193 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 141
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 195
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 32.7
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 24" 1280 720 HWP3226 HP V242h
Typical B560M-C Builds (Compare 4,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 100%
Desktop 101%
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback