Asus TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 191%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240318
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateMay 10 '24 at 22:03
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1018
98% 808 Pts
64-Core 1,404
87% 1,404 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
AMD(1002 0E37) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 251
Reflection 251
Parallax 474
204% 325 fps
MRender 314
Gravity 296
Splatting 276
240% 295 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 193%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 357 350 358 359 362 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 409
Mixed 316
SusWrite 357
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 42
146% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 272
232% 340 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 104%
Great: 128%
Xraydisk 1TB PRO 1TB
132GB free
Firmware: APF1M3R1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1323 63 910 71 216 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,308
Write 2,231
Mixed 1657
SusWrite 442
319% 1,410 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 63.1
206% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,194
DQ Write 864
DQ Mixed 1,089
797% 1,049 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 189%
Great: 334%
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00BLL 512GB
471GB free
Firmware: CL2QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1911 1917 1910 1933 1948 1913 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,025
Write 1,966
Mixed 1,660
SusWrite 1922
427% 1,893 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 65.2
223% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,221
DQ Write 918
DQ Mixed 1,096
812% 1,078 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 315%
Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Mic Electronics MGU416G40C19.MM1X 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
113% Outstanding
MC Read 51.1
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 41.3
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 32.1
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 42.8
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 50.9
79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV SSCR2
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI Builds (Compare 465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-E WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback